There are two motivations for this: 1. It looks like we're going to add other features that require server-side storage (e.g. user notes). 2. Namespacing glitchsoc modifications is a good idea anyway: even if we do not end up doing (1), if upstream introduces a keyword-mute feature that also uses a "KeywordMute" model, we can avoid some merge conflicts this way and work on the more interesting task of choosing which implementation to use. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| activitypub | ||
| ostatus | ||
| settings | ||
| application_extension.rb | ||
| delivery_failure_tracker.rb | ||
| exceptions.rb | ||
| extractor.rb | ||
| feed_manager.rb | ||
| formatter.rb | ||
| frontmatter_handler.rb | ||
| hash_object.rb | ||
| inline_renderer.rb | ||
| language_detector.rb | ||
| provider_discovery.rb | ||
| request.rb | ||
| sanitize_config.rb | ||
| status_filter.rb | ||
| status_finder.rb | ||
| tag_manager.rb | ||
| themes.rb | ||
| user_settings_decorator.rb | ||
| webfinger_resource.rb | ||