Merge 99ebb0415d into e8ebb8a981
Tom Thistlethwaite
GitHub
commit
01ebf51b05
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
|
|||
SLOCK COPYRIGHT Facebook
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Search
|
||||
|
||||
Tom
|
||||
Home
|
||||
Find Friends
|
||||
Friend requests
|
||||
Messages
|
||||
Notifications
|
||||
Account Settings
|
||||
Suggested Pages
|
||||
See All
|
||||
|
||||
E & E Modeling
|
||||
14 people like this.
|
||||
Like
|
||||
|
||||
EzCBD
|
||||
140 people like this.
|
||||
Like
|
||||
People you may know
|
||||
See All
|
||||
|
||||
David Wiggle Wiggle Smith
|
||||
Add FriendRemove
|
||||
English (UK) · English (US) · Deutsch · 中文(香港) · Esperanto
|
||||
Privacy · Terms · Advertising · AdChoices · Cookies ·
|
||||
More
|
||||
Facebook © 2018
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite shared a photo.
|
||||
18 August ·
|
||||
time.c.purelang.^£££sha3.c+++Tom Thistlethwaite.made a photo n.svg.c 0.wget.fb.com^work.facebook.com.curve.genus.0 Let x 0 α sin ( χ / α ) sinh ( t / α ) cosh ξ , x{0}=\alpha \sin(\chi /\alpha )\sinh(t/\alpha )\cosh \xi , x 1 α cos ( χ / α ) , x{1}=\alpha \cos(\chi /\alpha ), x 2 α sin ( χ / α ) cosh ( t / α ) , x{2}=\alpha \sin(\chi /\alpha )\cosh(t/\alpha ), x i α z i sin ( χ / α ) sinh ( t / α ) sinh ξ , 3 ≤ i ≤ n x{i}=\alpha z{i}\sin(\chi /\alpha )\sinh(t/\alpha )\sinh \xi ,\qquad 3\leq i\leq n where z i z{i}s describe a S n − 3 S{{n-3}}. Then the metric reads: d s 2 d χ 2 + sin 2 ( χ / α ) d s d S , α , n − 1 2 , ds{2}=d\chi {2}+\sin {2}(\chi /\alpha )ds_{{dS,\alpha ,n-1}}{2}, where d s d S , α , n − 1 2 − d t 2 + α 2 sinh 2 ( t / α ) d H n − 2 2 ds{{dS,\alpha ,n-1}}{2}=-dt{2}+\alpha {2}\sinh {2}(t/\alpha )dH{{n-2}}{2} is the metric of an n − 1 n-1 dimensional de Sitter space with radius of curvature α\alpha in open slicing coordinates. The hyperbolic metric is given by: d H n − 2 2 d ξ 2 + sinh 2 ξ d Ω n − 3 2 . dH{{n-2}}{2}=d\xi {2}+\sinh {2}\xi d\Omega {{n-3}}{2}. This is the analytic continuation of the open slicing coordinates under ( t , ξ , θ , ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , ⋯ , ϕ n − 3 ) → ( i χ , ξ , i t , θ , ϕ 1 , ⋯ , ϕ n − 4 ) (t,\xi ,\theta ,\phi _{1},\phi _{2},\cdots ,\phi _{{n-3}})\to (i\chi ,\xi ,it,\theta ,\phi _{1},\cdots ,\phi _{{n-4}}) and also switching x 0 x{0} and x 2 x{2} because they change their timelike/spacelike nature.}}}}}
|
||||
|
||||
===========================================
|
||||
|
||||
Standard Model of particle physics
|
||||
Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg
|
||||
Elementary particles of the standard model
|
||||
Background[show]
|
||||
Constituents[show]
|
||||
Limitations[show]
|
||||
Scientists[show]
|
||||
vte
|
||||
In theoretical physics, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is the theory of the strong interaction between quarks and gluons, the fundamental particles that make up composite hadrons such as the proton, neutron and pion. QCD is a type of quantum field theory called a non-abelian gauge theory, with symmetry group SU(3). The QCD analog of electric charge is a property called color. Gluons are the force carrier of the theory, like photons are for the electromagnetic force in quantum electrodynamics. The theory is an important part of the Standard Model of particle physics. A large body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years.
|
||||
|
||||
QCD exhibits two main properties:
|
||||
|
||||
Color confinement, plasmas. This is a consequence of the constant force between two color charges as they are separated: In order to increase the separation between two quarks within a hadron, ever-increasing amounts of energy are required. Eventually this energy produces a quark–antiquark pair, turning the initial hadron into a pair of hadrons instead of producing an isolated color charge. Although analytically unproven, color confinement is well established from lattice QCD calculations and decades of experiments.[1]
|
||||
Asymptotic freedom, a steady reduction in the strength of interactions between quarks and gluons as the energy scale of those interactions increases (and the corresponding length scale decreases). The asymptotic freedom of QCD was discovered in 1973 by David Gross and Frank Wilczek,[2] and independently by David Politzer in the same year.[3] For this work all three shared the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics.[4]
|
||||
|
||||
The worst self inflicted sacrifical position I have put myself into is telling others that I have Rapid Cycling Bipolar 1
|
||||
|
||||
Dumbest thing I've ever done& .Therefore, at the scalar potentials, the effects are stationary projected to and communicated from their reciprocal opponent, shown as the following conjugate pairs:
|
||||
( i.e. 1,0, and i #XER{dt} where XER are all real numbers, dt is time differential)#Pure Maths One can write the EFE in a more compact form by defining the Einstein tensor
|
||||
|
||||
{\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }=R_{\mu \nu }-{\tfrac {1}{2}}Rg_{\mu \nu },} {\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }=R_{\mu \nu }-{\tfrac {1}{2}}Rg_{\mu \nu },}
|
||||
which is a symmetric second-rank tensor that is a function of the metric. The EFE can then be written as
|
||||
|
||||
{\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\frac {8\pi G}{c^{4}}}T_{\mu \nu }.} {\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\frac {8\pi G}{c^{4}}}T_{\mu \nu }.}
|
||||
In standard units, each term on the left has units of 1/length2. With this choice of Einstein constant as 8πG/c4, then the stress-energy tensor on the right side of the equation must be written with each component in units of energy-density (i.e., energy per volume = pressure).
|
||||
2 hours ·
|
||||
# Reformulation of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) in the language of general relativity # Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
ftp.chown.fb.com. Entropy (S) must always be greater than OR LESS THAN 0. Because S = E / k where k is the number of possible microstates (ie E = mc2).c
|
||||
|
||||
# now whos crazy # #Scalar torsion and a new symmetry of general relativity.#
|
||||
|
||||
Can Infinitely Small Particles Have Negative Mass?
|
||||
|
||||
# I conjectured:
|
||||
At T=0K
|
||||
Yes, via the Casimir effect. If this is true, and can be proven, the third law can be BROKEN, at quantum scales.#
|
||||
|
||||
Einstein field equations and Mathematics of general relativity Having formulated the relativistic, geometric version of the effects of gravity, the question of gravity's source remains. In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, mass turns out to be part of a more general quantity called the energy–momentum tensor, which includes both energy and momentum densities as well as stress: pressure and shear.[35] Using the equivalence principle, this tensor is readily generalized to curved spacetime. Drawing further upon the analogy with geometric Newtonian gravity, it is natural to assume that the field equation for gravity relates this tensor and the Ricci tensor, which describes a particular class of tidal effects: the change in volume for a small cloud of test particles that are initially at rest, and then fall freely. In special relativity, conservation of energy–momentum corresponds to the statement that the energy–momentum tensor is divergence-free. This formula, too, is readily generalized to curved spacetime by replacing partial derivatives with their curved-manifold counterparts, covariant derivatives studied in differential geometry. With this additional condition—the covariant divergence of the energy–momentum tensor, and hence of whatever is on the other side of the equation, is zero— the simplest set of equations are what are called Einstein's (field) equations: Entropy (S) must always be greater than OR LESS THAN 0. Because S = E/k where k is the number of possible microstates (i.e. E=mc2)Introduce the fractal dimension of Time and the game changes.'We also study the generalized second law of thermodynamics in the framework of fractal universe. When the temperature of the apparent horizon and the matter fields inside the horizon are equal, i.e. T=Th, the generalized second law of thermodynamics can be fulfilled provided the deceleration and the equation of state parameters ranges either as −1≤q<0, −1≤w<−1/3 or as q<−1, w<−1 which are consistent with recent observations. We also find that for Th=bT, with b<1, the GSL of thermodynamics can be secured in a fractal universe by suitably choosing the fractal parameter β.'
|
||||
|
||||
In words, although mathematically at T=0 the entropy (S) of a perfect crystal is 0, a crystal is never perfect, because each action must be the result of a previous action (i.e. the conservation of momentum at Quantum scales.) So there is a sense in which the third law must NEVER be true, as perfect order requires stasis, or fixation of all fields. Either the big bang occurred as a result of a collapse of matter in a parent universe, or a partial and repeated contraction, S (entropy) is NEVER = 0. Theory
|
||||
Let $f$ be a function whose derivative exists in every point, \begin{theorem}https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=393702337829427&set=p.393702337829427&type=3
|
||||
|
||||
)
|
||||
{\frac {\mathrm {Spin} ^{+}(2,n-1)}{\mathrm {Spin} ^{+}(1,n-1)}}
|
||||
of spin groups.
|
||||
|
||||
This quotient formulation gives
|
||||
A
|
||||
d
|
||||
S
|
||||
n
|
||||
\mathrm {AdS} _{n} the structure of a homogeneous space. The Lie algebra of the generalized orthogonal group
|
||||
)
|
||||
o(1,n) is given by matrices
|
||||
|
||||
H
|
||||
(,where.x is a skew-symmetric matrix. A complementary generator in the Lie algebra ofG
|
||||
(2,n)} is
|
||||
|
||||
Q
|
||||
(0 a −a 0(←wt→ ⋯0⋯)(↑ ⋮ w 0 ↓ ⋮).These two fulfillG
|
||||
H x2<<QUBIT !!! WITH THIS ONE ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINT! QED !!! C(C++ All tensors are written in abstract index notation.[36] Matching the theory's prediction to observational results for planetary orbits or, equivalently, assuring that the weak-gravity, low-speed limit is Newtonian mechanics, the proportionality constant can be fixed as κ = 8πG/c4, with G the gravitational constant and c the speed of light.[37]><x2 The worst self inflicted sacrifical position I have put myself into is telling others that I have Rapid Cycling Bipolar 1
|
||||
|
||||
Dumbest thing I've ever done& .Therefore, at the scalar potentials, the effects are stationary projected to and communicated from their reciprocal opponent, shown as the following conjugate pairs:
|
||||
( i.e. 1,0, and i #XER{dt} where XER are all real numbers, dt is time differential)#Pure Maths One can write the EFE in a more compact form by defining the Einstein tensor
|
||||
|
||||
{\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }=R_{\mu \nu }-{\tfrac {1}{2}}Rg_{\mu \nu },} {\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }=R_{\mu \nu }-{\tfrac {1}{2}}Rg_{\mu \nu },}
|
||||
which is a symmetric second-rank tensor that is a function of the metric. The EFE can then be written as
|
||||
|
||||
{\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\frac {8\pi G}{c^{4}}}T_{\mu \nu }.} {\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\frac {8\pi G}{c^{4}}}T_{\mu \nu }.}
|
||||
In standard units, each term on the left has units of 1/length2. With this choice of Einstein constant as 8πG/c4, then the stress-energy tensor on the right side of the equation must be written with each component in units of energy-density (i.e., energy per volume = pressure).
|
||||
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite I'm very okay.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scalar torsion and a new symmetry of general relativity.
|
||||
|
||||
Can Infinitely Small Particles Have Negative Mass?
|
||||
|
||||
# I conjectured:
|
||||
At T = 0K
|
||||
Yes, via the Casimir effect. If this is true, and can be proven, the third law can be BROKEN, at quantum scales.
|
||||
|
||||
Einstein field equations and Mathematics of general relativity Having formulated the relativistic, geometric version of the effects of gravity, the question of gravity's source remains. In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, mass turns out to be part of a more general quantity called the energy-momentum tensor, which includes both energy and momentum densities as well as stress: pressure and shear. [35] Using the equivalence principle, this tensor is readily generalized to curved spacetime. Drawing further upon the analogy with geometric Newtonian gravity, it is natural to assume that the field equation for gravity relates this tensor and the Ricci tensor, which describes a particular class of tidal effects: the change in volume for a small cloud of test particles that are initially at rest, and then fall freely. In special relativity, conservation of energy-momentum corresponds to the statement that the energy-momentum tensor is divergence-free. This formula, too, is readily generalized to curved spacetime by replacing partial derivatives with their curved-manifold counterparts, covariant derivatives studied in differential geometry. With this additional condition-the covariant divergence of the energy-momentum tensor, and hence of whatever is on the other side of the equation, is zero- the simplest set of equations are what are called Einstein's (field) equations: Entropy (S) must always be greater than OR LESS THAN 0. Because S = E / k where k is the number of possible microstates (ie E = mc2) Introduce the fractal dimension of Time and the game changes.c
|
||||
|
||||
In words, although mathematically at T = 0 the entropy (S) of a perfect crystal is 0, a crystal is never perfect, because each action must be the result of a previous action (ie the conservation of momentum at Quantum scales.) So there is a sense in which the third law must NEVER be true, as perfect order requires stasis, or fixation of all fields. Either the big bang occurred as a result of a collapse of matter in a parent universe, or a partial and repeated contraction, S (entropy) is NEVER = 0. Theory
|
||||
Let $ f $ be a function whose derivative exists in every point,? \ begin {theorem} https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=393702337829427&set=p.393702337829427&type=3
|
||||
|
||||
)
|
||||
{\ frac {\ mathrm {Spin} ^ {+} (2, n-1)} {\ mathrm {Spin} + (1, n-1)}}
|
||||
of spin groups.
|
||||
|
||||
This quotient formulation gives
|
||||
A
|
||||
d
|
||||
S
|
||||
n
|
||||
\ mathrm {AdS} _ {n} the structure of a homogeneous space. The Lie algebra of the generalized orthogonal group
|
||||
)
|
||||
o (1, n) is given by matrices
|
||||
|
||||
H
|
||||
(, where.x is a skew-symmetric matrix. A complementary generator in the Lie algebra ofG
|
||||
(2, n)} is
|
||||
|
||||
Q
|
||||
(0 a -a 0 (← wt → ⋯ 0 ⋯) (↑ ⋮ w 0 ↓ ⋮) these two fulfillG
|
||||
H x2 << QUBIT !!! WITH THIS ONE ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINT! QED! C (C ++ All tensors are written in abstract index notation. [36] Matching the theory's prediction to observational results for planetary orbits or, equivalently, assuring that the weak-gravity, low-speed limit is Newtonian mechanics, the proportionality constant can be fixed as κ = 8πG / c4, with G the gravitational constant and c the speed of light. [37]> <x2 The worst self inflicted sacrifical position I have put myself into is telling others that I have Rapid Cycling Bipolar 1
|
||||
|
||||
Dumbest thing I've ever done & .Therefore, at the scalar potentials, the effects are stationary projected to and communicated from their reciprocal opponent, shown as the following conjugate pairs:
|
||||
(ie 1,0, and i # XER {dt} where XER are all real numbers, dt is time differential) # Pure Maths One can write the EFE in a more compact form by defining the Einstein tensor
|
||||
|
||||
{\ displaystyle G _ {\ mu \ nu} = R _ {\ mu \ nu} - {\ tfrac {1} {2}} Rg _ {\ mu \ nu},} {\ displaystyle G _ {\ mu \ nu} = R_ {\ mu \ nu} - {\ tfrac {1} {2}} Rg _ {\ mu \ nu},}
|
||||
which is a symmetric second-rank tensor that is a function of the metric. The EFE can then be written as
|
||||
|
||||
{\ displaystyle G _ {\ mu \ nu} + \ Lambda g {\ mu \ nu} = {\ frac {8 \ pi G} {c4}} T {{mu \ nu}.} {\ displaystyle G _ {\ mu \ nu} + \ Lambda g _ {\ mu \ nu} = {\ frac {8 \ pi G} {c4}} T {{mu \ nu}.}
|
||||
In standard units, each term on the left has units of 1 / length2. With this choice of Einstein constant as 8πG / c4, then the stress-energy tensor on the right side of the equation must be written with each component in units of energy-density (ie, energy per volume = pressure).
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
Like · Reply · 41m
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite # x1x2do {dialectic - the §hadow is the same as §elfTom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ glose.svg.c #
|
||||
-bash: glose.svg.c #: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ A thought experiment with regards deep entropies that I followed on an trip once was to imagine the greatest depth i could. Maximum entropies at the event horizon, the fractal depths of possibility ...... The lack of a way out of that .... but that denies the loop I found within the Third Law. The infinite free lunch .....
|
||||
-bash: A: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ Yet the iterations all occur, yes things happen as they were always going to from the start, # § but denial of agency denies life itself. # then you are back onto the problem of # sisyphus
|
||||
-bash: Yet: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $, but there is a way out =>
|
||||
-bash: syntax error near unexpected token `newline '
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ achievement, compassion, helping others, helping yourself. The smaller things in life. Not the bigger picture? //////////////////// # surely the bigger picture is the one that counts. € # t = 1s._ ≠ - ≠≠ - ≠ - ≠≠ - ≠ - ≠ -------ººº¡¡ª €
|
||||
ªª§.
|
||||
you've come this far, so do not give up.§0x2x1.c} {} ++ 1vTom Thistlethwaite Last Nights Dialectic. x sudo bash tom's dialectic}
|
||||
§ # x1x2do {dialectic - the §hadow is the same as §elf ++ the 'soul' is yet another concept (a mental organ of depth) -> then what !?
|
||||
There is no eternal return or second chance, yet objectively, and subjectively, without relying on the base software that we are given by our DNA, by our upbringings, and society, there are no (points) to be made. There are no objective 'goods' or 'bads' beyond those set out by consensus. ### {but what if you disagree with the consensus?} [§ # wrong, logically you know that is what you argue against .... - there are objective positives and negatives in terms of this planet, and in terms of animal and human suffering} #] §
|
||||
It's not that this universe is an accident, it is that it is not ipso facto 'freeing' landscape. The universe does not care. Our life paths, however directed, all end in the same way.
|
||||
F (ZΩ) - so it follows that all relevant system-bash: achievement ,: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ 1§.
|
||||
-bash: 1§ .: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ you've come this far, so do not give up.§0x2x1.c} {} ++ 1vTom Thistlethwaite Last Nights Dialectic. x sudo bash tom's dialectic}
|
||||
> § # x1x2do {dialectic - the §hadow is the same as §elf ++ the 'soul' is yet another concept (a mental organ of depth) -> then what !?
|
||||
> There is no eternal return or second chance, yet objectively, and subjectively, without relying on the base software that we are given by our DNA, by our upbringings, and society, there are no (points) to be made. There are no objective 'goods' or 'bads' beyond those set out by consensus. ### {but what if you disagree with the consensus?} [§ # wrong, logically you know that is what you argue against .... - there are objective positives and negatives in terms of this planet, and in terms of animal and human suffering} #] §
|
||||
> It's not that this universe is an accident, it is that it is not ipso facto 'freeing' landscape. The universe does not care. Our life paths, however directed, all end in the same way.
|
||||
F (ZΩ) - so it follows that all relevant systems are part of oneself, as opposed to parts of others (other than the emulation of 'you') that others have playing in their mind {their objective and observational version of 'you' playing through their lens} {{define}} {{you choose whose opinion (s) matter to you, and whose you do not care about +++}}
|
||||
& yet time only goes -> that way ..) then we have another problem .
|
||||
### if life itself is bound to end, ### and that is the main problem, what does it matter what fills the interceding part? {if that is the case, then by definition that is all that matters fool} and so ergo.
|
||||
§ one could say that is all that matters § & that the you should follow the hedonistic path ± but without variance that too becomes boring.
|
||||
§Mmmm
|
||||
What else then? #
|
||||
$ Thought thought with regards deep entropies that I followed on an trip once was to imagine the greatest depth i could. Maximum entropies at the event horizon, the fractal depths of possibility ...... The lack of a way out of that .... but that denies the loop I found within the Third Law. The infinite free lunch .....
|
||||
-bash: A: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ Yet the iterations all occur, yes things happen as they were always going to from the start, # § but denial of agency denies life itself. # theny are back onto the problem of #sisyphus
|
||||
-bash: Yet: command not found
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $, but there is a way out =>
|
||||
-bash: syntax error near unexpected token `newline '
|
||||
Tom-Thistlethwaite-macbook-air: ~ tomthistlethwaite $ achievement, compassion, helping others, helping yourself. The smaller things in life. Not the bigger picture? //////////////////// # surely the bigger picture is the one that counts.0www.facebook.com/tom.thistlethwaite . c ADS. anti de sitter.boolean.node In AdS space time is periodic, and the universal cover has non-periodic time. The coordinate patch above covers half of a single period of the spacetime.
|
||||
|
||||
Because the conformal infinity of AdS is timelike, specifying the initial data on a spacelike hypersurface would not determine the future evolution uniquely (ie deterministically) unless there are boundary conditions associated with the conformal infinity.
|
||||
|
||||
The "half-space" region of anti-de Sitter space and its boundary.
|
||||
Another commonly used coordinate system which covers the entire space is given by the coordinates t,
|
||||
r
|
||||
⩾
|
||||
0
|
||||
No automatic alt text available.
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
18 August
|
||||
12 Comments1 share
|
||||
1Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Love
|
||||
Show More Reactions
|
||||
Comment
|
||||
Comments
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite e=mc^2 Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LoveShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w · Edited
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite s=k.ln.(w) #the 2nd law of thermodynamics
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LoveShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w · Edited
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite where c=3*10^8 ms^-1
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LoveShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite where G= The measured value of the constant is known with some certainty to four significant digits. In SI units its value is approximately 6.674×10−11 N·kg–2·m2.
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite and the Third Law of Thermodynamics {The Entropy of a Perfect Crystal at T=0Kelvin is Exactly Equal to Zero.)
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite {D.exe A classical formulation by Nernst (actually a consequence of the Third Law) is: It is impossible for any process, no matter how idealized, to reduce the entropy of a system to its absolute-zero value in a finite number of operations.[4][5]{Dispr…See more
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Yesterday at 10:09 AM ·
|
||||
{Chown TET} [10] A modern, quantitative analysis follows. {by me.} x1 x2…See more
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w · Edited
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite ###disproof of Third Law Thermodynamics. How does one disprove the third law of thermodynamics?
|
||||
Follow · 2
|
||||
Request…See more
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite Entropy (S) must always be greater than OR LESS THAN 0. Because S = E / k where k is the number of possible microstates (ie E = mc2)
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite f1f1f1f1f1zer.q
|
||||
1
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
July 31 at 8:37 AM ·
|
||||
J!p-adic tensor x § in a euclidian sense, the universe in completely flat. q1 Suppose the the concept of 0 IS prime. reinterpreting Eq. (9) in view of the quantized nature of the lowest-lying energy states, the …See more
|
||||
Manage
|
||||
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 10w
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite
|
||||
Tom Thistlethwaite Let (x_1,y_1) and (x_2,y_2) be two points on an elliptic curve E with elliptic discriminant
|
||||
|
||||
Delta_E=-16(4a^3+27b^2) …See more
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue